When Nuphar couldn’t win in court with truth or facts, she turned to something far more destructive: lies, collusion, manipulation, and parental alienation.

Instead of supporting her child’s right to both parents, she chose to destroy the relationship between the child and his true Primary Parent Father — the parent who actually raised him.

This wasn’t an accident. This wasn’t a misunderstanding. This was a deliberate strategy.

Parental Alienation Is Child Abuse

Parental alienation is not “conflict.” It is not “co‑parenting issues.” It is child abuse.

In every case of alienation, there are three roles:

• The Child — the victim
• The Alienated Parent — the victim
• The Alienator — the perpetrator of abuse

In my experience, Nuphar has been the perpetrator for years.

Why She Turned to Alienation

Due to postpartum depression, jealousy, and an inability to cope with the loving bond between her son and his father, Nuphar resorted to:

• lying
• fraud
• perjury
• manipulation
• collusion with agenda‑driven organizations

All to steal the rights of both father and child.

She could not handle the fact that the child’s strongest emotional connection was with his father — so she set out to destroy it.

A Multi‑Year Pattern of Abuse

Parental alienation is not a single act. It is a pattern — and in this case, a long‑term one.

From my perspective, Nuphar has:

• Blocked the child from the father who raised him
• Cut the child off from the father’s entire family
• Fed the child false narratives to poison his view
• Manipulated the child emotionally to create fear and rejection
• Rewarded the child for rejecting the father
• Used the legal system as a weapon
• Ignored court orders
• Acted with complete disregard for the child’s emotional wellbeing

This is psychological abuse, and it has been ongoing for years.

Contempt of Court

Nuphar is currently in contempt of court orders for blocking visitation between her son and his Primary Parent Father.

She is not acting in the child’s best interests. She is acting in her own interests — at the child’s expense.

And the Ontario courts, driven by their own biases and agendas, have enabled her behaviour instead of protecting the child.

Parental Alienation Is Child Abuse. She Is Guilty.

The damage she has caused is real. The harm to the child is real. The destruction of the father–son relationship is real.

This is abuse. This is manipulation. This is cruelty.

And in my experience, she is guilty of every part of it.

Parental Alienation is Child Abuse. She is guilty.

Here is another person guilty of her crimes…

Yoni Shiewitz